Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: invalid tests with super (fixes #9539) #9545

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 30, 2017
Merged

Conversation

not-an-aardvark
Copy link
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[x] Bug fix (fixes #9539)

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

This corrects some tests which used super in an invalid way, and are
now failing due to an acorn upgrade.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Nothing in particular

@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark added accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion bug ESLint is working incorrectly build This change relates to ESLint's build process labels Oct 30, 2017
This corrects some tests which used `super` in an invalid way, and are
now failing due to an acorn upgrade.
@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark merged commit a9606a3 into master Oct 30, 2017
@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark deleted the fix-super-tests branch October 30, 2017 22:52
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 29, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Apr 29, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion bug ESLint is working incorrectly build This change relates to ESLint's build process
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Running the tests on a vanilla fork fails
2 participants