Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(exec): add tests for coverage #744

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 18, 2017
Merged

test(exec): add tests for coverage #744

merged 2 commits into from Jun 18, 2017

Conversation

nfischer
Copy link
Member

No logic change.

This adds one test to cover some missing lines, and adds some istanbul ignore
directives.

I see 100% line coverage for src/exec.js when running:

$ nyc --reporter=text --reporter=lcov ava --serial test/exec.js`

Fixes #742

No logic change.

This adds one test to cover some missing lines, and adds some `istanbul ignore`
directives.

I see 100% line coverage for `src/exec.js` when running:

```sh
$ nyc --reporter=text --reporter=lcov ava --serial test/exec.js`
```

Fixes #742
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 18, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #744 into master will increase coverage by 0.68%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #744      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.65%   97.34%   +0.68%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines        1227     1244      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         1186     1211      +25     
+ Misses         41       33       -8
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/exec.js 100% <ø> (+7.4%) ⬆️
src/head.js 98.68% <0%> (+3.94%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c16fb7d...77db162. Read the comment docs.

@nfischer
Copy link
Member Author

self-LGTM since this has no change to production logic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants