Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Always respect log level silent #74

Merged

Conversation

jackfranklin
Copy link
Contributor

Based on our discussions in #73. LMK what you think :)

…anges

We now respect the logLevel when logging out the results of files that have been changed by
`format-files`. Previously even if the log level was silent we still logged this out.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #74 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master    #74   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files           3      3           
  Lines         103    104    +1     
=====================================
+ Hits          103    104    +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/format-files.js 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dbcf8ed...b854f5b. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@kentcdodds kentcdodds left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wonderful! Thank you very much :)

@kentcdodds kentcdodds merged commit b216b12 into prettier:master Jun 9, 2017
@jackfranklin jackfranklin deleted the always-respect-log-level-silent branch June 9, 2017 14:57
@jackfranklin
Copy link
Contributor Author

🎉 you are welcome!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants