Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: prefer smaller scope for variables in codebase #9265

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 9, 2017

Conversation

not-an-aardvark
Copy link
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[x] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

I made an attempt at implementing the prefer-smaller-scope rule proposal, which was originally proposed in #5284. That attempt can be found here.

Unfortunately, I found that the rule would incorrectly report some places where declaring a variable in an outer scope is necessary if an inner scope is executed multiple times. I don't know of a good way to avoid those false positives while still keeping the rule useful.

let flag; // `flag` is only ever used in the function, but still needs to be declared outside it.

function doSomethingAfterFirstCall() {
    if (flag) foo();
    flag = flag || true;
}

However, by implementing the rule I found a number of cases where we can reduce the scope of the variables.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Nothing in particular

@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark added the chore This change is not user-facing label Sep 8, 2017
@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@mention-bot
Copy link

@not-an-aardvark, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @mysticatea, @gyandeeps and @IanVS to be potential reviewers.

@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark merged commit f31f59d into master Sep 9, 2017
@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark deleted the prefer-smaller-scope branch September 9, 2017 00:49
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 9, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Mar 9, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion chore This change is not user-facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants