Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: use consistent names for apply-disable-directives in tests #9246

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 8, 2017

Conversation

not-an-aardvark
Copy link
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[x] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

This updates the test file for apply-disable-directives to always use the correct name.

When working on this locally, I went through a few different names for the module before settling on apply-disable-directives. However, there were a few places I forgot to update with the latest name.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Nothing in particular

@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark added the chore This change is not user-facing label Sep 6, 2017
@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark force-pushed the consistent-name-apply-disable-directives branch from 1bee3b4 to 2de80bc Compare September 8, 2017 21:18
@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@platinumazure platinumazure merged commit 31e4ec8 into master Sep 8, 2017
@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark deleted the consistent-name-apply-disable-directives branch September 8, 2017 21:50
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 8, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Mar 8, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion chore This change is not user-facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants