Chore: avoid internal SourceCode methods in Linter tests (refs #9161) #9223
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
LGTM |
|
@not-an-aardvark, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @aladdin-add and @gyandeeps to be potential reviewers. |
not-an-aardvark
force-pushed
the
no-sourcecode-passthroughs-linter-tests
branch
from
88b2412
to
25a06be
Compare
|
LGTM |
not-an-aardvark
force-pushed
the
no-sourcecode-passthroughs-linter-tests
branch
from
25a06be
to
ace6184
Compare
|
LGTM |
platinumazure
approved these changes
Sep 8, 2017
eslint-deprecated
bot
added
the
archived due to age
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[x] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
This updates the tests for
Linterto avoid using undocumented methods as passthroughs toSourceCode.Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Nothing in particular