Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: avoid using internal Linter APIs in RuleTester (refs #9161) #9172

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 28, 2017

Conversation

not-an-aardvark
Copy link
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[x] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

This updates RuleTester to use the public Linter#defineRule API rather than the private Linter#on API.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Nothing in particular

This updates `RuleTester` to use the public `Linter#defineRule` API rather than the private `Linter#on` API.
@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark added the chore This change is not user-facing label Aug 28, 2017
@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@mention-bot
Copy link

@not-an-aardvark, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @Daniel15, @nzakas and @mysticatea to be potential reviewers.

@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark merged commit 2dc243a into master Aug 28, 2017
@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark deleted the no-private-api-ruletester branch August 28, 2017 23:14
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 25, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Feb 25, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion chore This change is not user-facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants