New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs: Clarified PR guidelines in maintainer guide #8876
Conversation
@platinumazure, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @nzakas and @btmills to be potential reviewers. |
LGTM |
TSC Summary: Goal is to clarify and improve the PR guidelines in the maintainer guide. I tried to make changes that were either obvious clarifications/reorganizations, or that reflected our actual practices. Nonetheless, this might need TSC review to make sure I'm not inadvertently proposing to change maintainer guidelines. TSC Question: Are the proposed changes acceptable and accurate? |
1. Is the commit summary too long? | ||
|
||
The bot will add a comment specifying the problems that it finds. You do not need to look at the pull request any further until those problems have been addressed (there's no need to comment on the pull request to ask the submitter to do what the bot asked - that's why we have the bot!). | ||
|
||
Once the bot checks have been satisfied, you check the following: | ||
|
||
1. Double-check that the commit message tag ("Fix:", "New:", etc.) is correct based on the issue (or, if no issue is referenced, based on the stated problem). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add something like Note that documentation-only pull requests do not require an issue.
to the end of this?
That's no longer accurate (or rather sufficient): we only require issues on
core changes now. I believe I included a note to that effect elsewhere in
the commit but I'll double check.
…On Jul 4, 2017 8:49 PM, "Kai Cataldo" ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In docs/maintainer-guide/pullrequests.md
<#8876 (comment)>:
> 1. Is the commit summary too long?
The bot will add a comment specifying the problems that it finds. You do not need to look at the pull request any further until those problems have been addressed (there's no need to comment on the pull request to ask the submitter to do what the bot asked - that's why we have the bot!).
Once the bot checks have been satisfied, you check the following:
+1. Double-check that the commit message tag ("Fix:", "New:", etc.) is correct based on the issue (or, if no issue is referenced, based on the stated problem).
Can we add something likeNote that documentation-only pull requests do
not require an issue. to the end of this?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8876 (review)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARWejceI3Y-RP3_YeSD3wmaYvw5I1_kks5sKuuZgaJpZM4ONcSP>
.
|
Sorry - you're right. This LGTM! |
These changes were accepted by the TSC in the 2017-07-06 meeting. |
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[x] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofixing to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[x] Other, please explain: Modifying PR guidelines in maintainer guide
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
In the PR guide for maintainers:
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
I tried to make changes that were either obvious clarifications/reorganizations, or that reflected our actual practices. Nonetheless, this might need TSC review to make sure I'm not inadvertently proposing to change maintainer guidelines.