Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: remove identical tests #8851

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 1, 2017
Merged

Conversation

not-an-aardvark
Copy link
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[x] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

This removes rule tests that were identical to other tests in the same file, making them completely redundant.

These cases were detected by the new no-identical-tests rule in eslint-plugin-eslint-plugin. I'm planning to enable that rule on the codebase in a follow-up PR.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Nothing in particular

This removes rule tests that were identical to other tests in the same file, making them completely redundant.

These cases were detected by the new [`no-identical-tests`](https://github.com/not-an-aardvark/eslint-plugin-eslint-plugin/blob/8c19ab5eb8942e35f102ca300a83ac73f67ce26f/docs/rules/no-identical-tests.md) rule in `eslint-plugin-eslint-plugin`. I'm planning to enable that rule on the codebase in a follow-up PR.
@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark added the chore This change is not user-facing label Jul 1, 2017
@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@mention-bot
Copy link

@not-an-aardvark, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @nzakas, @alberto and @pmcelhaney to be potential reviewers.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion chore This change is not user-facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants