Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: improve test coverage for node-event-generator #8287

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 18, 2017

Conversation

not-an-aardvark
Copy link
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[x] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

Previously, there were insufficient tests for alphabetical selector sorting in the case where selectors had equal specificity. There were also no tests for emitting a selector whose type could not be inferred while exiting the AST.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Nothing in particular

Previonsly, there were insufficient tests for alphabetical selector sorting in the case where selectors had equal specificity. There were also no tests for emitting a selector whose type could not be inferred while exiting the AST.
@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark added the chore This change is not user-facing label Mar 18, 2017
@mention-bot
Copy link

@not-an-aardvark, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @mysticatea to be a potential reviewer.

@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark merged commit f8176b3 into master Mar 18, 2017
@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark deleted the node-event-generator-coverage branch March 18, 2017 22:28
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Feb 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion chore This change is not user-facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants