Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: unify checks for statement list parents #8048

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 8, 2017

Conversation

not-an-aardvark
Copy link
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[x] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

There are currently three types of nodes that can contain a list of statements:

  • Program
  • BlockStatement
  • SwitchCase

Several rules have to check for these node types, and sometimes they do it incorrectly (see #8047). This commit puts the node types in a constant in ast-utils.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Nothing in particular

There are currently three types of nodes that can contain a list of statements:

* `Program`
* `BlockStatement`
* `SwitchCase`

Several rules have to check for these node types, and sometimes they do it incorrectly (see #8047). This commit puts the node types in a constant in `ast-utils`.
@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark added the chore This change is not user-facing label Feb 8, 2017
@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@platinumazure platinumazure left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark merged commit 329dcdc into master Feb 8, 2017
@not-an-aardvark not-an-aardvark deleted the ast-utils-statement-list-parents branch February 8, 2017 22:59
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Feb 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion chore This change is not user-facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants