Update: add "variables" option to no-use-before-define (fixes #7111) #7948
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
not-an-aardvark
added
accepted
|
LGTM |
gyandeeps
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2017
|
👏 |
This was referenced Feb 3, 2017
This was referenced Feb 5, 2017
eslint-deprecated
bot
added
the
archived due to age
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[x] Changes an existing rule (see #7111)
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
This adds a
variablesoption tono-use-before-definerule. When the option is set tofalse, the rule allows variables to be used before they are defined if the declaration is in an upper scope.Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
I'm concerned that there might be edge-cases that I didn't account for in the tests. It would be useful to double-check the tests and double-check that there aren't any special cases where this logic will work incorrectly.