Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Update so issues are not required (fixes #7015) #7072

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 9, 2016
Merged

Conversation

nzakas
Copy link
Member

@nzakas nzakas commented Sep 7, 2016

What issue does this pull request address?
#7015

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

  1. Updated all the references to requiring an issue for PRs.
  2. Updated the PR bot to not check for issues in commit messages.
  3. Updated issue templates and created new templates for various things.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

What do you think about the various templates? I tried to balance the need for getting important information into the pull request with not overwhelming people.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@nzakas, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the annotation information on this pull request, we identified @Mardak, @mikesherov and @mysticatea to be potential reviewers

@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@@ -71,7 +70,7 @@ The `Tag` is one of the following:

Use the [labels of the issue you are working on](working-on-issues#issue-labels) to determine the best tag.

The message summary should be a one-sentence description of the change, and it must be 72 characters in length or shorter. The issue number should be mentioned at the end. If the commit doesn't completely fix the issue, then use `(refs #1234)` instead of `(fixes #1234)`.
The message summary should be a one-sentence description of the change, and it must be 72 characters in length or shorter. If the pull request addresses an issue, the the issue number should be mentioned at the end. If the commit doesn't completely fix the issue, then use `(refs #1234)` instead of `(fixes #1234)`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

an issue, then* the

@kaicataldo
Copy link
Member

LGTM aside from the suggestions already mentioned

@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM


* **ESLint Version:**
* **Node Version:**
* **npm Version:**
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need Node version and NPM version? We are sometimes very strict about requiring all of the fields in the template be filled out, and those two might make a difference, but only very occasionally. For most bugs they don't really matter.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see a downside to asking for this info. The fewer times we need to ask for more info, the faster triage goes.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The downside is higher bar of entry. If we ask for it in the template but don't insist on people providing that information if they skipped it, I'm fine with it. But requiring 100% of people to provide it when it might only be relevant in 2% of cases is an overkill.

@nzakas
Copy link
Member Author

nzakas commented Sep 9, 2016

Okay, going to merge this. As always, we can see how this works in reality and make incremental changes to address any problems we find.

@nzakas nzakas merged commit 457be1b into master Sep 9, 2016
@nzakas nzakas deleted the issue7015 branch September 9, 2016 19:00
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Feb 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants