Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: Use object-shorthand batch 3 (refs #6407) #6914

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 16, 2016

Conversation

kaicataldo
Copy link
Member

@kaicataldo kaicataldo commented Aug 16, 2016

First batch: #6893
Second batch: #6897

Breaking this up into batches as per the discussion here: #6812

This is the third and final batch (/lib/rules). This one finally enables the rule! 馃帀

@eslint/eslint-team Will merge this after I get a few pairs of eyes on this. Discussed with @nzakas in Gitter and we decided to get these reviewed and merged without having to wait the full two days. Since this touches so many files, waiting even a few days can lead to merge conflicts.

@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@mention-bot
Copy link

@kaicataldo, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the annotation information on this pull request, we identified @gyandeeps, @vitorbal and @NickHeiner to be potential reviewers

@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ rules:
no-useless-constructor: "error"
no-with: "error"
no-var: "error"
object-shorthand: "error"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Enabled rule!

@ilyavolodin
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@ilyavolodin ilyavolodin merged commit c676322 into master Aug 16, 2016
@kaicataldo kaicataldo deleted the objectshorthand3 branch August 16, 2016 02:27
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Feb 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants