Docs: Update options in object-shorthand
#6898
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@meeber, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the annotation information on this pull request, we identified @pedrottimark, @martijndeh and @lemonmade to be potential reviewers |
|
LGTM |
|
LGTM. Thanks for PR! |
eslint-deprecated
bot
added
the
archived due to age
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What issue does this pull request address?
Minor documentation issue. The option values for the
object-shorthandrule were listed twice, but when the newconsistentandconsistent-as-neededvalues were added only the second list was updated.What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Rather than update the first list with the new option values, I just got rid of it. It seemed unnecessary to have two lists given that the first list was right above the second list.
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Global warming