Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Fixing typos (refs #5446) #6494

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2016
Merged

Docs: Fixing typos (refs #5446) #6494

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2016

Conversation

originalfoo
Copy link
Contributor

@originalfoo originalfoo commented Jun 21, 2016

Fixing typos that were identified in an earlier PR.

These typos were picked up in earlier PR but due to me making a mess of
github I've had to put them in a separate PR. See #6453 for original PR.
@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@mention-bot
Copy link

By analyzing the blame information on this pull request, we identified @alberto, @pedrottimark and @IanVS to be potential reviewers

@nzakas
Copy link
Member

nzakas commented Jun 22, 2016

Lgtm. In the future, please put "(refs #5446)" in your commit message. Doc commits don't require issues, but if you include an issue, it should still be in the general format.

@nzakas nzakas merged commit 01384fa into eslint:master Jun 22, 2016
@originalfoo originalfoo changed the title Docs: Fixing typos #5446 Docs: Fixing typos (refs #5446) Jun 22, 2016
@originalfoo originalfoo deleted the set1edits branch June 22, 2016 18:28
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Feb 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants