Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stop creating recursive symlink (addon requiring itself) #6912

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 28, 2017

Conversation

clekstro
Copy link
Contributor

When running the addon/smoke-test-slow test in isolation, I was getting an EEXIST error that the node_modules/developing-addon symlink that we were creating manually in this test is already present. Deleting the extra test setup resolved the issue.

This just impacts the test suite and was a precursor to #6911.

Many thanks to @Turbo87 for helping to track this down ❤️

@Turbo87 Turbo87 added the bug label Mar 27, 2017
@rwjblue
Copy link
Member

rwjblue commented Mar 28, 2017

@homu r+

@homu
Copy link
Contributor

homu commented Mar 28, 2017

📌 Commit 99b4e6a has been approved by rwjblue

homu added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2017
Stop creating recursive symlink (addon requiring itself)

When running the `addon/smoke-test-slow` test in isolation, I was getting an `EEXIST` error that the `node_modules/developing-addon` symlink that we were creating manually in this test is already present. Deleting the extra test setup resolved the issue.

This just impacts the test suite and was a precursor to #6911.

Many thanks to @Turbo87 for helping to track this down ❤️
@homu
Copy link
Contributor

homu commented Mar 28, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 99b4e6a with merge 84401eb...

@homu
Copy link
Contributor

homu commented Mar 28, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status

@homu homu merged commit 99b4e6a into ember-cli:master Mar 28, 2017
@clekstro clekstro deleted the remove-recursive-symlink branch March 28, 2017 03:46
homu added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2017
Backport fixes to release branch

#6912, #6911, #6910 and #6919
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants