Fix timestamp() setting a key named "null" in some cases #1820
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Introduction
The previous PR introduced a bug where a model could end up with a key named "null" if the user specified a custom
hasTimestamps
value that included a literalnull
as the second key name. This would lead to a SQL error complaining about a nonexistent column named "null" or "undefined".Proposed solution
This checks if a
updatedAt
key exists first before attempting any other comparisons. The problem was in the first condition that would incorrectly returntrue
if the key hadn't been set, even though it should only be checking if it had been set by the user.