Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't write BOM for search index file #705

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 1, 2018

Conversation

bwasty
Copy link
Contributor

@bwasty bwasty commented Feb 23, 2018

The search doesn't work when search.js has a BOM - loading it fails with

Uncaught SyntaxError: Invalid or unexpected token

See also cginternals/webgl-operate#22.

@iamam34
Copy link

iamam34 commented Feb 28, 2018

I've just encountered this issue too. Thanks for fixing! 👍

@aciccarello aciccarello merged commit 64cf362 into TypeStrong:master Mar 1, 2018
fabioberger added a commit to 0xProject/typedoc that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2018
* 'master' of github.com:TypeStrong/typedoc:
  Don't write BOM for search index file (TypeStrong#705)
  fix: check for null variable when excludeNotExported is true (TypeStrong#694)
  0.10.0
  Update dependencies (TypeStrong#689)
  Allow multiple excludes (TypeStrong#592)
  fix(package): update fs-extra to version 5.0.0 (TypeStrong#661)
  fix(package): update @types/highlight.js to version 9.12.0 (TypeStrong#647)
  Fix `--plugin` argument parsing (TypeStrong#682)
  update renderer specs
  Upgrade tslint to 5.9.1 (TypeStrong#683)
  Implemented '--excludeProtected' option similar to the '--excludePriv… (TypeStrong#666)
  Use remove component method (TypeStrong#664)
  Added support for generic type aliases (TypeStrong#622)
  dont parse comment for tags inside a code block (TypeStrong#633)

# Conflicts:
#	package.json
#	src/lib/utils/options/sources/component.ts
@aciccarello aciccarello added this to the 0.11.0 milestone Mar 2, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants