Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: use neo-async instead async #538

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 3, 2018
Merged

Conversation

alexander-akait
Copy link
Member

@alexander-akait alexander-akait commented Feb 20, 2018

Notable Changes

  • Increase performance

Reference: webpack/webpack#6470

Copy link
Member

@jhnns jhnns left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR 👍

Tbh, I doubt that this has any measurable performance impact on the sass-loader, since we're just using the queue, but I'm ok with the change.

I just had one comment on the webpack dev dependency, then we're good to go 👍

package.json Outdated
@@ -47,7 +47,8 @@
"standard-version": "^4.2.0",
"style-loader": "^0.18.2",
"webpack-dev-server": "^2.4.1",
"webpack-merge": "^4.0.0"
"webpack-merge": "^4.0.0",
"webpack": "^3.11.0"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is there a dev dependency on webpack?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jhnns need for local tests, remove from PR?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the status here ? :)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@evilebottnawi Can you remove it for now please ? :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@michael-ciniawsky let's do it 👍

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #538 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #538   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.43%   97.43%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines         117      117           
=======================================
  Hits          114      114           
  Misses          3        3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/loader.js 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 620bdd4...a9a3a78. Read the comment docs.

@alexander-akait
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @michael-ciniawsky

@jhnns
Copy link
Member

jhnns commented Mar 6, 2018

@michael-ciniawsky @evilebottnawi thx 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants