Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add assertType.hasProperty() #50

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 5, 2020
Merged

feat: add assertType.hasProperty() #50

merged 2 commits into from Jan 5, 2020

Conversation

unional
Copy link
Owner

@unional unional commented Jan 5, 2020

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 5, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #50 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #50      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.01%   98.03%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          22       22              
  Lines         101      102       +1     
  Branches        5        5              
==========================================
+ Hits           99      100       +1     
  Misses          2        2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/assertType.ts 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e1afb93...f2aced4. Read the comment docs.

@unional unional merged commit 89e2dbb into master Jan 5, 2020
@unional unional deleted the hasProperty branch January 5, 2020 01:29
@unional
Copy link
Owner Author

unional commented Jan 5, 2020

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.31.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants