Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Warning behavior for executeOnText (fixes #6611) #6632

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 8, 2016
Merged

Conversation

nzakas
Copy link
Member

@nzakas nzakas commented Jul 8, 2016

What issue does this pull request address?
#6611

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

Previously, executeOnText() would lint an ignored file if warnIgnored was false. I changed it so that it always ignores files that should be ignored and only outputs a warning when warnIgnored is true.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Nothing in particular.

@eslintbot
Copy link

LGTM

@ilyavolodin
Copy link
Member

LGTM, but waiting another day for others to look

@gyandeeps
Copy link
Member

LGTM 👍
Thanks for contributing.

@gyandeeps gyandeeps merged commit baeb313 into master Jul 8, 2016
@nzakas
Copy link
Member Author

nzakas commented Jul 8, 2016

@gyandeeps remember to wait 2 days before merging, just to make sure everyone who wants to review has a chance to. Dont worry about this one, just keep in mind for the future.

@nzakas nzakas deleted the issue6611 branch July 8, 2016 22:00
@gyandeeps
Copy link
Member

@nzakas this was pretty straight forward thats why i did it.
Will keep in mind tho. 😄

@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2018
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Feb 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants