Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf(tabs): avoid extra resize handler and reflow #6434

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 15, 2017

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto commented Aug 12, 2017

In #6304, an extra window resize handler was added in order to call _checkPaginationEnabled. This handler is unnecessary, because we have another resize handler a little bit below that calls _updatePagination, which will call _checkPaginationEnabled internally. The original issue that #6304 was fixing was due to the fact that the current listener wasn't being run in the Angular zone. These changes remove the extra listener, increase the debounce interval and move the handler back into the zone. There may be a slight overhead from moving the listener into the zone, however it should be offset by not having another listener and not calling _checkPaginationEnabled twice.

In angular#6304, an extra window resize handler was added in order to call `_checkPaginationEnabled`. This handler is unnecessary, because we have another resize handler a little bit below that calls `_updatePagination`, which will call `_checkPaginationEnabled` internally. The original issue that angular#6304 was fixing was due to the fact that the current listener wasn't being run in the Angular zone. These changes remove the extra listener, increase the debounce interval and move the handler outside back into the zone. There may be a slight overhead from moving the listener into the zone, however it should be offset by not having another listener and not calling `_checkPaginationEnabled` twice.
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Aug 12, 2017
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker and removed pr: needs review labels Aug 14, 2017
@andrewseguin andrewseguin merged commit 1df79e9 into angular:master Aug 15, 2017
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 6, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants